Skip to main content

Thoughts From Martin Luther

Dear Friends,

Today was a momentous day in the history of the church. It was the day in 1521 A.D. that the German Reformer Martin Luther arrived at the Diet of Worms, thinking he would have a debate about his 95 public criticisms of the Catholic Church. For those who don’t know, the word “Diet” referred to the calling together of a formal deliberating assembly of Catholic theologians and officials to consider an important issue, and this one was held in Germany, in the city named Worms.


Luther had tried to resolve his differences with the church amicably, hoping the church would see its mistakes and make the necessary changes. He was surprised, therefore, to discover when he arrived in Worms that it was not to be a debate, but a trial. Pope Leo demanded Luther retract 41 of the 95 Thesis’ that he posted on the door of the church in Wittenberg or be condemned as a heretic. So, the purpose of the Diet was not to debate but simply to hear Luther either renounce and recant his views and thus be acquitted of the charges of heresy or affirm them and be condemned as a heretic and executed.

Those who know history know that Luther refused to renounce them, was excommunicated, and condemned. In fact, he would have been executed if Prince Frederick the Wise, the Elector of Saxony, who admired Luther, hadn’t secretly kidnapped him, and hid him in the tower of his castle Wartburg for nine months! There Luther was able to write pamphlets that fed the Protestant Reformation, as people all over Europe sought to find him! He was one of the most wanted ‘outlaws’ of his day.


On the day after his arrival at Worms, April 17, Luther (having prayed all night) offered the reason for his refusal to recant, despite knowing it would likely cost him his life. His famous words below should still challenge us:

“Unless I can be instructed and convinced with evidence from the Holy Scriptures, or with open, clear, and distinct grounds of reasoning… then I cannot and will not recant, because it is neither safe nor wise to act against one’s conscience. Here I stand. I can do no other. God help me! Amen!”

When attempts to change his mind over the next few days failed, Luther was condemned. It was an edict which remained in effect until the day he died, limiting Luther’s travel, and forcing him to stay under the protection of Prince Frederick all his life.



I have used Luther’s words often in counseling sessions: “It is not wise to act against your conscience.” Especially a biblically informed conscience. In fact, Luther’s response presses us all to ask:

If it had been ME who had discovered (by correctly interpreting Holy Scripture) that certain theological and ethical issues needed to be fixed, would I have stood true to my conscience and the Word despite opposition?

Would I have done it (like Luther did) if I knew that by doing so, I would be condemned by nearly all my friends, or worse yet, executed?

Is being humbly true to my conscience that important to me?

Could I live with myself if I knew I should, but caved, when the truth of the Gospel hung in the balance (the truth of salvation by grace through faith alone)?

Is holding to the truth of the Gospel something I would consider worth suffering or dying for?


It is worth asking.

Contending with you for the Truth of the Gospel, Pastor Jeff

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thoughts From Horatius Bonar

Dear Friends, If you are like me, you may have had a bad experience in the past with churches that stressed “holiness.” Not because churches shouldn’t, but because the focus was placed on outward conformity to externalisms, or a prescribed set of moralism’s that sucked the atmosphere of grace out of the church. In fact, the more effort-based versions of “holiness” are stressed, the more grace disappears – and the vacuum left in its wake is filled with even more rigid standards of morality and law-based duties – driving all who truly struggle with sin into hiding or pretending. And of all the books I have ever read on holiness (or godliness) none (in my opinion) hold a candle to “God’s Way of Holiness” by the Scottish minister Horatius Bonar (1808-1889). A book I have given to numerous people to read. If you were one who was turned off, or wounded, by a form of holiness based on what Bonar calls, “constrained externalism” or self-effort, I offer you this selection as a taste of w...

Thoughts From Thomas Wilcox

Dear Friends, Every once in a while, you come across an individual who can say a lot in a very little space. I don’t possess that ability, but Thomas Wilcox (1621-1687) did. Below are some of his profound insights on the Gospel found in the only tract he wrote, originally entitled, “A Choice Drop of Honey from the Rock Christ.” And don’t think that because it’s about the Gospel, you can just brush it aside because you already know it. Jerry Bridges (one of my profs at seminary and a prolific author who passed in 2016) once played us a recording in class of the responses given by best-selling Christian authors at a Bookseller’s Conference in response to the question, “What is the Gospel?” The responses were lacking at best and a couple of them made us wonder if could even be Christian at all. So, read these excerpts from his tract and see if you get what he means and if you agree. (I have updated the language where possible.) Enjoy. “When you believe and come to Christ, you...

Thoughts On Lent from Jeremy Linneman

Dear Friends, As we have entered the time of the church year traditionally called “Lent” (from the Old English word “lencten” referring to the season of Spring) there is always the common idea floating around that, “I should probably give up something for Lent.” The question is “Why?” Why give something up or practice self-denial? And the only good answer is: God in Scripture calls his people to do so, it actually benefits us, is intended to benefit others, and brings glory to God. We find this idea stated explicitly in Isaiah 58:6-9. There God says to his people who are fasting simply to deprive themselves of something (to prove their earnestness?) or in an attempt to be, “heard on high” (trying to manipulate God into answering our often self-focused prayers?) “This is the real reason he wants His people to fast: “Is not this the kind of fasting I have chosen: to loose the chains of injustice and untie the cords of the yoke, to set the oppressed free and break every yoke? Is i...