Skip to main content

Thoughts From Daniel Fuller

Dear Friends,

Have you ever been challenged by a skeptic to “prove” the existence of God? I have. And though I can’t offer “proof” sufficient to convince every skeptic, I can say the most reasonable argument for God’s existence begins by affirming our existence. It goes like this:

Being cannot come from non-being. That is, something cannot come from nothing. Existence cannot come from non-existence. Therefore, if we reason backwards – since being cannot come from non-being the fact that we exist proves God's existence. And his existence proves the eternality of his existence, since he could not be if he had not always been. If there is a God, he must always have existed, for if he did not, he would not and could not exist now – and neither could we or anything else.


With some slight differences of nuance, or phrasing, most theologians would tend to agree. Yet that raises another question: If God has always existed, why did he wait so long to create? Stretch the timeline back far enough and most scientists would now say there was a time when “nothing” existed. With this the Bible agrees, since the author of Hebrews tells us God created “out of nothing” – “ex nihilo” (Heb. 11:3). Though I should clarify that “out of nothing” means “out of nothing other than himself” – the eternally existent One.

With that said, I offer you this week’s thought from Daniel Fuller taken from his book, "The Unity of the Bible" (a must read by the way if you want to engage with skeptics) in the chapter entitled: "Why Did God Wait So Long to Create the World?" In a world full of skeptics who don’t like pat answers, these things can be helpful to ponder. Enjoy.

"The declaration in Psalm 90:2 that, 'Before the mountains were born or you (God) brought forth the earth and the world, from everlasting to everlasting you are God," indicates that vast eons of time elapsed before God acted to establish the earth, so it would reflect His glory.

But Irenaeus, Augustine, and Calvin – some of the church's greatest leaders – have sternly warned people not to ask what God was doing before he created, or to wonder why he waited so long to create... I believe, however, that it is both lawful and expedient to ask why the triune God waited a long time to create the world. For from the very fact that God waited, we know that he did not create out of the necessity involved in need-love [He did not create because he was “lonely,” or had some "inner unmet need to have someone to love,” as some suggest].

Since God the Father found infinite happiness in Jesus, the Son, then it becomes clear that from all eternity God has enjoyed his Son's love and companionship, showing that the creation of the world was NOT a necessary act that God undertook to overcome loneliness, but an act that flowed from the freedom involved in benevolent love.


It would be threatening to our future happiness to know that God created us to meet some need in himself... Yet the moment we understand that all of God's need-love was met in being a Trinity, then we see that he was free to act toward us, his creation, solely in terms of the freedom of a benevolent love… When God invites us to a banquet out of benevolent love, he wants us to join with him as guests at his table, to enjoy the feast along with him – as the psalmist put it, to drink from the river of his delights (36:8).

So, God's having delayed creation for a long while makes it unmistakably clear that he created us not out of need, but in the freedom of his benevolent love – out of mercy and grace. Therefore, contrary to Irenaeus, Augustine, and Calvin, it is most edifying to know why a long period elapsed before God created the world.”

I might add that if one believes that God created out of need-love – or because he was lonely and needed beings outside himself to offer him love in order to feel complete – and those creatures upon whom he has made his happiness depend reject him, or desire no communion or fellowship with him (which we see throughout Scripture), then that sets such people up for viewing God as nearly always sad, mad, depressed, weeping, or unfulfilled. If God’s joy is dependent upon receiving love and adoration from the creatures he has made – rather than the Son with whom He is always pleased, and in whom he always delights – and they don't respond to him in love, it can lead such people to have a very depressing view of God.

Just some food for thought, Pastor Jeff


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thoughts from Charles Spurgeon on Chronic Pain

Dear Friends, Life is not always easy. Things come our way that inflict pain and wound the heart. Sickness can steal away our energy and strength for a time – though it is more difficult when it is chronic. My father was diagnosed with Rheumatoid arthritis at the age of 43 and struggled with its effects until he passed away at 85 – being told close to that time that his physical body was like that of a 110-year-old. Being in constant pain earned him the occasional nick-name, “Grumpy Grampy.” I could understand why. Pain is no fun. I’m not the easiest to be around when I’m in constant pain either. And as John Owen once pointed out, “It is not the intensity of the trial, but its longevity, that eats away at our resolve.” Therefore, if you are struggling in this area (or know someone who is), today I offer you some helpful words from Charles Spurgeon. Yet, it helps to point out he was not giving advice as one who did not himself struggle. He battled much of his life with depressi...

Thoughts From Charles Spurgeon

Dear Friends, Sometimes spiritual truths are best understood using illustrations that include things familiar to us in our everyday lives. To come up with some of his best illustrations Charles Spurgeon would spend considerable blocks of time walking down the street, through gardens, into the fields and woods, and visiting those places where his parishioners worked and lived. It is surely one of the reasons he has been called, “The Prince of Preachers." One of the best preachers in all church history. He gives some credit for learning to do this to the Puritan Thomas Manton. Speaking of Manton’s writings (which consist of 22 volumes, mostly sermons), Spurgeon says, “There is not one poor discourse in the whole collection; he is evenly good, constantly excellent.” Along with Richard Sibbes (another Puritan) Manton was one of Spurgeon’s ‘mentors’ as a preacher. His first book of illustrations, entitled “Feathers for Arrows” was phenomenally popular, so 13 years later he wrote...

Thoughts from Dr. Matt O'Reilly

Dear Friends, As I look online, I see a lot of posts by Christians voicing their sentiments on politics and the coming election. Some do it in a civil and engaging fashion, while others seem to be, “agree with me or exit the conversation.” Some paint their candidate as a flawless savior and the opposing candidate as the devil in the flesh, while others admit that both candidates (being human) are sinners, and therefore have flaws and blind spots – straying in differing areas from a well-rounded biblical or gospel-like perspective. The Gospel is too radical to be captive to any flawed and lacking human political party’s agenda. I try to stay out of politics, and have always kept it out of the pulpit, despite advice to the contrary. But since it is a reality we must deal with I prefer to simply offer guidance. The first section (in purple) is wise counsel on Christian involvement in politics in general, not from me, but from a man named Dr. Matt O’Reilly. Obviously, I agree wi...