Skip to main content

Thoughts from Greg Koukl

Dear Friends,

Today's selection is by Greg Koukl, and is entitled, "The Irony of Intolerance." In this excerpt he shares his thoughts regarding "tolerance" and "civility" in a culture where civil dialogue has all but disappeared from the public forum. A culture where simply disagreeing with someone (even if respectfully) can be met with accusations of "bigotry" "hate" and "intolerance." If you've noticed that, and are wondering why, and would hope to help bring change, you may find his insights helpful. Enjoy.



"In today's world, one word is invoked as the No. 1 rule of civil behavior in conversation: "tolerance." And while most people think they understand what it means, a recent discussion I had with high school students exposed some fuzzy thinking on the subject. I began by writing two sentences on the board. The first, "All views are equally valid," expressed a popular understanding of tolerance. All heads nodded in agreement. Nothing controversial here. Then I wrote the second sentence. "Jesus is the Messiah and Jews are wrong for rejecting him." "You can't say that," a student challenged, clearly annoyed. "That's intolerant," she said, noting that the second statement violated the first. What she didn't see was that the first statement violated itself.

I pointed to the first statement and asked, "Is this a view, this idea that all views have equal merit?" The students all agreed. Then I pointed to the second statement - the "intolerant" one - and asked the same question: "Is this a view?" Slowly the point began to dawn on them. If all views are equally valid, then the view that Christians are right about Jesus and Jews are wrong, is just as valid as the idea that Jews are right and Christians are wrong. But this is hopelessly contradictory. They can't both be true.


"Would you like to know how to escape this trap?" I asked. They nodded. "Reject the popular misunderstanding of tolerance and return to the classical view."
I turned to the board and wrote two principles I learned from Peter Kreeft of Boston College: "Be egalitarian regarding persons. Be elitist regarding ideas." "Treat PEOPLE as equally valuable, but treat IDEAS as if some are better than others," I said, "because they are. Some ideas are true, some are false. Some are brilliant, others are dangerous. Some are just plain silly." To say so does not violate any meaningful standard of tolerance. "Real tolerance," I explained, "Is about how we treat people, not ideas." Classic tolerance requires that every person be free to express his ideas without fear of abuse or reprisal, not that all views have equal validity, merit, or truth.


By contrast, the popular definition of tolerance turns the classical formula on its head: "Be egalitarian regarding ideas. Be elitist regarding persons." If you reject another's IDEAS, you're automatically accused of disrespecting the PERSON (as the student did with me). In this view, no idea can be opposed -- even if done graciously -- without inviting the charge of incivility. The offender can then be personally maligned, publicly marginalized, and verbally abused as bigoted, disrespectful, ignorant, and - ironically - intolerant. This view of tolerance has gone topsy-turvy... Contrary opinions are labeled as "imposing your view on others" and are quickly silenced. Tolerance becomes intolerance.


Whenever you are charged with intolerance ask for a definition. If tolerance means neutrality, then no one is ever tolerant, because no one is ever neutral about his or her own opinions. This kind of tolerance is a myth. Jesus had no need for this kind of manipulation and no interest in it. He took the confrontations as they came and engaged them with intelligence, confidence and grace. He answered his critics with truth, not with empty charges of intolerance."

It has long been pointed out that the premise underlying the new vs. the classical view of "tolerance" (the thought which suggests that "Everything is relative and there are no absolutes") contains within it a self-contradiction. One can say MOST things are relative without being self-contradictory, but one cannot say EVERYTHING is relative, and there are NO absolutes, without being self-contradictory, for it is simply to abolish many absolutes in favor of just one. And if intolerance results from people holding to absolutes (as is often suggested), then changing from "absolutes (plural)" to just one overarching "absolute (singular)" will by no means do away with intolerance. It simply reorients the direction of the intolerance and who its target becomes.

In this fallen world I fear intolerance will never completely disappear this side of eternity. But there is another way to seek to curtail intolerance and the growing lack of civility we see in our society -- gospel grace. Not "organized religion" (which has often been the culprit), but the grace of Jesus. A Christlike respect and civility that actually seeks to reach out in love to those it disagrees with, intentionally seeking to love all people (even our enemies) because Jesus has told us to, and because we know that God loved us when we were His enemies (Rom. 5:10). Tolerance begins to happen when those to whom God has been gracious seek to treat others in the way.

 
Partners in what is not an easy task, Pastor Jeff

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thoughts In Memory of Tim Keller

Dear Friends, News broke last Friday (May 19) that pastor Tim Keller had gone home to be with Jesus. I must say that his commitment to a gospel-centered understanding and application of Scripture, his determination to reach this generation, his encouragement to live out the Gospel through our lives and words and actions, his keen insights into contemporary culture, and his gracious way of engaging even with those he disagreed with – have been an inspiration to me and multitudes of others. He was truly a gift of God to many pastors and parishioners in our day. Therefore, today, in honor of his life and ministry, I offer you a mere sampling of 20 Tim Keller quotes. But I warn you that although reading Keller can be insightful and refreshing, it can also be a bit convicting and unsettling. Through his insights you will learn to see old things in a new light (which stirs the spirit!), but you will also discover that you do some of what you do for reasons other than what you had th

Thoughts From Priscilla Shirer

Dear Friends, During difficult times have you ever been tempted to focus only on the negative, the lack, the struggle, the sense of hopelessness? And if you were tempted to do so, did it blind you to what you did have? Did it cause you to overlook the blessings that were there all along, even in the midst of those times of lack? It’s not hard to do so. Our mounting concerns during difficult times can blind us to God’s supply. This week’s “thought” speaks to that situation. It comes from the devotional book entitled “Awaken” by Priscilla Shirer. A friend gave it to me a couple weeks back and I’m just starting to go through it. This particular devotion is entitled “What Do You Have?” and is based on II Kings 4:2 where a widow owes money, is confronted by creditors who come and threaten to take her two sons and sell them into slavery, in order to cover her debt. When Elisha finds out, he asks her: “What can I do for you? Tell me, what do you have in your house?” Priscilla’s

Thoughts From Horatio Spafford

Dear Friends, I like stories. True stories. And not always stories that have a happy ending. In fact, I have gained much solace from stories that were very sad (like this one), but were helpful because they were about real people, struggling with raw emotions, and real issues, in an imperfect and fallen world where our ultimate hope must rest elsewhere. This morning I read a story I've read before. It's one I have even shared from the pulpit before. And I know that many of you (like me) have already heard as well. But then I thought, "Maybe some do not know it." And if you happen to be one, you need to read on! I pass this story along for you. For those who have not heard the story behind the writing of the hymn, "It Is Well With My Soul" by Horatio Spafford. Because once you know the story behind it, it's hard to ever sing it again in the same way. And even if you already know it, it is always helpful to pause and think once again about a